Finger Smith Essay
In the extract of ‘Finger Smith’
the audience are faced with the representational issue of sexuality and the
binary opposites of homosexuality vs heterosexuality. In this case it is based around
a woman’s homosexual desire for her servant. Due to the Victorian setting of
the show her homosexuality is disapproved of while she is forced into a marriage
with a man. Immediately this confronts the audience with the binary opposite of
progressive vs regressive. The progressive side is her gay feelings that
parallel a more modern day concept where it is more socially accepted. However
this is opposed to the regression of a forced heterosexual marriage much more common
to the Victorian setting. Regression wins in the clip as she is made to accept
the fate of the forced marriage. This is made possible as the male character
holds all the power and is able to manipulate her to her desires. However as
the audience we are expected to empathise with the female character. Forced
into a marriage that violates her sexuality the audience is made to empathise
with her as she struggles as the weak underdog vs the strong man. Her struggles
are made clear with the polysomic iconic red paint dripping conveying not only
her love for her servant but also the anger and pain she is forced to feel by
being denied this. This creates a binary opposite of fair vs unfair created by
the director in order to represent the hardship of lesbian Victorian women
being forced to repress their homosexuality. As an audience we are positioned
in the close up of the man threatening the woman whilst strangling her. Thus
the director is forcing us to emote the same degrading situation she is forced
into as a gay woman being subdued. This represents her sexuality to the
audience as something important and acceptable which we long to be empowered
over her degrading situation. Alternatively in the opening scenes during her
non diegetic monologue we are presented with a tainted mirror. This tainting
forms a parallel with the tainting seen upon herself by others and herself in
her sexual confusion over her homosexuality. In light of other positive
representations of homosexuality this portrays it as not wrong but as something
that is not entirely socially acceptable. This in itself has been created by
the director to not just comment on attitudes to homosexuality in Victorian times
but also on an issue still common in parts of the modern world. Her sexual fear can also be made apparent to
the audience through the mise en scene of the symbolic white gloves she wears. This
highlights her attempts to cover up her homosexual frustration with the pure
virginity of the white glove. This plays a key part throughout making us as an
audience empathise with her even more as we are positioned by the director in
the medium close up to watch the heterosexual man take it from her. This
combined with the sexual act of her hand defines him and his heterosexuality as
the bully who can force his way into what he wants. This allows the director to
make the social comment about how heterosexuality is expected as the normal in
life and anything other is regarded as different or unnatural. In the closing
scene the audience are made to view the lust through the female gaze at her
servant. Her exaggerated beauty combined with nudity is created for us to view
her in the same way her homosexuality does. This allows us to empathise with
and understand that her lesbian tendencies and how homosexuality should never
and can never be repressed. A strong part of representation of sexuality is the
stereotypical confusion about hers that she faces, portraying how homosexuality
is something that is ok but you have to come to terms with as a slight
abnormality. This is demonstrated by the combination of fades and non-diegetic
music the director creates for us evoking the tension that is built as she
struggles to come to terms in her head about who she really is. However her lust is confirmed as she is painting when
the director shows from her point of view the close up of the servants breasts
and genitals. This confirms to the audience and to her that it is what she
wants and homosexuality is not a choice it is who you are and a part of your
identity. In conclusion it is evident that homosexuality is portrayed as
something good and that should be acceptable by all. However it is also clearly
depicted to not be as strong as heterosexuality and that it has been forced to
submit to something that is currently more powerful. Heterosexuality has been
given the strength which has been represented as evil and manipulating by the
man, but also as kind and innocent by the servant woman. This gives it a
paradoxical aspect as having a side that can be good yet another that is so
evil.